spacer

  National Drug Abuse Treatment 

line
black line
White Sep

Use your browser's back button to choose another title or click here for a New Search.

Effectiveness of Motivational Incentives in Stimulant Abusing Outpatients with Different Treatment Histories.

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2007;33:129-137. [DOI: 10.1080/00952990601091101]

Therese Killeen, PhD (Medical University of South Carolina, SC Node), Rickey E. Carter, PhD (Medical University of South Carolina, SC Node), Marc L. Copersino, PhD (National Institute on Drug Abuse), Nancy M. Petry, PhD (University of Connecticut School of Medicine), Maxine L. Stitzer, PhD (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MA Node).

View Article (Institutional subscription may be required. Need help getting a copy?)

Clinical Trials Network protocol CTN-0006 implemented motivational incentives in a large, randomized multicenter clinical trial conducted with over 400 patients at 8 psychosocial treatment programs in the U.S. Its findings showed that participants in the MI intervention group had more consecutive stimulant-free urine drug screens versus the usual care condition. Participants in the MI group also were retained in treatment for an average of 8 (+/= 4.2) weeks compared to 6.9 (+/- 4.4) weeks for the usual care group. This study examined the characteristics and outcomes of less versus more treatment experienced by participants in the trial in an attempt to determine if prize-based abstinence incentives would differentially affect substance abuse outcomes in patients with different treatment histories. Treatment-seeking outpatients with more or less prior treatment episodes were randomized to receive either prize-based incentives plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Outcome variables included longest sustained period of abstinence, number of negative urine drug screens (UDS), and retention in treatment. Results of this study found that treatment-experienced participants were older, more likely to be female, African American, and unemployed, and with more severe cocaine and psychiatric problems. The effectiveness of incentives did not differ significantly between the two treatment history groups with regard to the outcome measures. This analysis begins to delineate the factors that are associated with response to MI interventions and extends the literature on differential treatment responsivity of drug abuse patients with different treatment histories. (Article (Peer-Reviewed), PDF, English, 2007)

Keywords: Behavior therapy | Contingency management (CM) | CTN platform/ancillary study | MIEDAR | Motivational incentives | Retention | Stimulant abuse | American Journal of Alcohol and Drug Abuse (journal)

Document No: 223

Submitted by CTN Dissemination Librarians, 8/8/2007

AUTHORS SEARCH LINK
Carter, Rickey E. search mail
Copersino, Marc L. search
Killeen, Therese search mail
Petry, Nancy M. search mail
Stitzer, Maxine L. search mail
PROTOCOLS
NIDA-CTN-0006 search www
NODES & CTPs
Mid-Atlantic (Lead) search www
  HARBEL Prevention and Recovery Center search www
Delaware Valley search www
  Thomas Jefferson Intensive Substance Abuse Treatment Program search www
New England search
  LMG Programs, Inc. search www
Pacific Region search www
  Matrix Institute on Addictions search www
Rocky Mountain Regional search www
  Arapahoe/Douglas Mental Health Network search www
  Crossroads Turning Points, Inc. search www
Southern Consortium search www
  Charleston Center search www
  Circle Park Behavioral Health (Florence, Salt Lake City) search www

Supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse to the University of Washington Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute.
The materials on this site have neither been created nor reviewed by NIDA.
Updated 8/2007 -- http://ctndisseminationlibrary.org/display/223.htm
info@ctndisseminationlibrary.org