spacer

  National Drug Abuse Treatment 

line
black line
White Sep

Use your browser's back button to choose another title or click here for a New Search.

Effectiveness of Abstinence-Based Incentives: Interaction With Intake Stimulant Test Results.

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2007;75(5):805-811

Maxine L. Stitzer, PhD (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MA Node), Nancy M. Petry, PhD (University of Connecticut School of Medicine), Jessica M. Peirce, PhD (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MA Node), Kimberly C. Kirby, PhD (University of Pennsylvania, DV Node), Therese Killeen, PhD (University of South Carolina, SC Node), John M. Roll, PhD (Washington State University, Tacoma), John A. Hamilton (Yale University, NE Node), Patricia Q. Stabile, MSW, LCSW-C, C-CATODSW (HARBEL Prevention and Recovery Center, MA Node), Robert C. Sterling, PhD (University of Pennsylvania, DV Node), Chandra Brown, PhD, MSW (Charleston Center, SC Node), Ken B. Kolodner, ScD (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MA Node), Rui Li (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MA Node).

View Article (Institutional subscription may be required. Need help getting a copy?)

Intake urinalysis test results (drug positive vs. negative) has been previously identified as a strong predictor of drug abuse treatment outcome, but there is little information about how this prognostic factor may interact with the type of treatment delivered. The authors used data from a multisite study of abstinence incentives for stimulant abusers enrolled in outpatient counseling treatment (protocol CTN-0006) to examine this question. The first study urine was used to stratify participants into stimulant negative (n = 306) versus positive (n = 108) subgroups. Abstinence incentives significantly improved retention in those testing negative but not in those testing positive. Findings suggest that stimulant abusers presenting to treatment with a stimulant-negative urine benefit from abstinence incentives, but alternative treatment approaches are needed for those who test stimulant positive at intake. (Article (Peer-Reviewed), PDF, English, 2007)

Keywords: Behavior therapy | Contingency management (CM) | CTN platform/ancillary study | MIEDAR | Motivational incentives | Stimulant abuse | Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (journal)

Document No: 253

Submitted by CTN Dissemination Librarians, 11/13/2007.

AUTHORS SEARCH LINK
Brown, Chandra search
Hamilton, John A. search mail
Killeen, Therese search mail
Kirby, Kimberly C. search mail
Kolodner, Ken B. search mail
Li, Rui search mail
Petry, Nancy M. search mail
Peirce, Jessica M. search mail
Roll, John M. search mail
Stabile, Patricia Q. search
Sterling, Robert C. search mail
Stitzer, Maxine L. search mail
PROTOCOLS
NIDA-CTN-0006 search www
NODES & CTPs
Mid-Atlantic (Lead) search www
  HARBEL Prevention and Recovery Center search www
Delaware Valley search www
  Thomas Jefferson Intensive Substance Abuse Treatment Program search www
New England search
  LMG Programs, Inc. search www
Pacific Region search www
  Matrix Institute on Addictions search www
Rocky Mountain Regional search www
  Arapahoe/Douglas Mental Health Network search www
  Crossroads Turning Points, Inc. search www
Southern Consortium search www
  Charleston Center search www
  Circle Park Behavioral Health (Florence, Salt Lake City) search www

Supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse to the University of Washington Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute.
The materials on this site have neither been created nor reviewed by NIDA.
Updated 11/2007 -- http://ctndisseminationlibrary.org/display/253.htm
info@ctndisseminationlibrary.org