Use your browser's back button to choose another title or click here for a New Search.

How to Get the Article

 Email CTN Library (free)

PubMed Central (free)

Journal subscriber access




Bookmark and Share



Subjective Effects, Misuse, and Adverse Effects of Osmotic-Release Methylphenidate Treatment in Adolescent Substance Abusers with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 2011;21(5):455-463. [doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0014]

Theresa M. Winhusen, PhD (University of Cincinnati/CinARC, OV Node), Daniel F. Lewis (University of Cincinnati/CinARC, OV Node), Paula D. Riggs, MD (University of Colorado Denver, FNA Node), Robert D. Davies, MD (University of Colorado, FNA Node), Lenard A. Adler, MD (New York University School of Medicine, GNY Node), Susan C. Sonne, PharmD (Medical University of South Carolina, SC Node), Eugene C. Somoza, MD, PhD (University of Cincinnati/CinARC, OV Node).

Psychostimulants are effective treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but may be associated with euphoric effects, misuse/diversion, and adverse effects. These risks are perceived by some clinicians to be greater in substance-abusing adolescents relative to non–substance-abusing adults. The present study evaluates the subjective effects, misuse/diversion, and adverse effects associated with the use of osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH), relative to placebo, for treating ADHD in adolescents with a substance use disorder (SUD) as a function of substance use severity and compared these risks with those associated with the treatment of ADHD in adults without a non-nicotine SUD. Datasets from two randomized placebo-controlled trials of OROS-MPH for treating ADHD, one conducted with 303 adolescents (CTN-0028) with at least one non-nicotine SUD and one with 255 adult smokers (CTN-0029), were analyzed. Outcome measures included the Massachusetts General Hospital Liking Scale, self-reported medication compliance, pill counts, and adverse events (AEs). Euphoric effects and misuse/diversion of OROS-MPH were not significantly affected by substance use severity. The euphoric effects of OROS-MPH did not significantly differ between the adolescent and adult samples. Adults rated OROS-MPH as more effective in treating ADHD, whereas adolescents reported feeling more depressed when taking OROS-MPH. The adolescents lost more pills relative to the adults regardless of treatment condition, which suggests the importance of careful medication monitoring. Higher baseline use of alcohol and cannabis was associated with an increased risk of experiencing a treatment-related AE in OROS-MPH, but baseline use did not increase the risk of serious AEs or of any particular category of AE and the adolescents did not experience more treatment-related AEs relative to the adults.

Conclusions: With good monitoring, and in the context of substance abuse treatment, OROS-MPH can be safely used in adolescents with an SUD despite non-abstinence. (Article (Peer-Reviewed), PDF, English, 2011)

Keywords: Adverse events | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) | Adolescents | Concerta | CTN platform/ancillary study | Osmotic-Release Methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) | Pharmacological therapy | Stimulant abuse | Smoking | Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (journal)

Document No: 694, PMID: 22040190, PMCID: PMC3243465.

Submitted by CTN Dissemination Librarians, 11/7/2011.

Adler, Lenard A. search mail
Davies, Robert D. search
Lewis, Daniel F. search mail
Riggs, Paula D. search mail
Somoza, Eugene C. search mail
Sonne, Susan C. search mail
Winhusen, Theresa M. search mail
NIDA-CTN-0028 www
NIDA-CTN-0029 www
Appalachian Tri-State www
Delaware Valley www
Florida Node Alliance www
Greater New York www
Mid-Atlantic www
New England Consortium www
Ohio Valley www
Southern Consortium www
Texas www
Western States www

Supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse to the University of Washington Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute.
The materials on this site have neither been created nor reviewed by NIDA.
Updated 10/2012 --